Blade Runner 2049 Has One Strange Plot Hole

Blade Runner 2049 Has One Strange Plot Hole

Contents

Blade Runner 2049 is mostly free of plot holes. Mostly. There’s one strange moment that feels like a retcon.

You Are Reading :[thien_display_title]

Blade Runner 2049 Has One Strange Plot Hole

Major spoilers for Blade Runner 2049.

–

Blade Runner 2049 is an exemplary sequel for its complete lack of plot holes and contrivances in relation to the original – with the exception of one key retcon regarding Blade Runner “partner” Gaff.

While legacy-quels – belated follow-ups to fan favorite classics – tend to be full of reverence to the original, they typically also wind up creating their fair share of plot holes. Star Wars: The Force Awakens by its existence calls into question the resolution of the original trilogy. Creed effectively made the ridiculous antics of Rocky IV (and, if you really want, Rocky V) somewhat emotive. And George Miller was so free-and-loose with his attention to the original Mad Max trilogy that some believe Fury Road doesn’t even follow the original Rockatansky.

Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 mostly manages to sidestep this problem. At the center of the narrative is an explanation of what happened after the very end of the original (although not a resolution to the perennial “Is Deckard a replicant?” mystery), but never does the twisting plot lead to a contradiction. Except in one area: Gaff.

Gaff in the Original Blade Runner

Blade Runner 2049 Has One Strange Plot Hole

Played by Edward James Olmos, Gaff is one of two other Blade Runners we see in the original film. Introduced dragging Deckard out of retirement to face the Roy Batty threat, he works with Rick in the early stages of his investigation, ferrying him around from LAPD HQ to Tyrell’s to the rogue replicants’ flat. He then reappears at the end to passively congratulate Deckard for beating Batty and warning him that Rachael is still a target.

See also  Star Wars 10 Kylo Ren Predictions For Rise Of Skywalker

What makes Gaff so memorable despite his small role in the narrative is his ephemera. Decked out in vibrant-yet-smart future-wear and speaking in a mash-up language called Cityspeak (which any article is obliged to point out Olmos created himself), he plants scene-capping origami figures mocking Deckard: a chicken when he refuses to return to duty; a man with an erect penis when researching the replicant’s flat; and, most ironically, a silver unicorn as Deckard escapes with Rachael. That remains the movie’s biggest hint that our protagonist was, in fact, a replicant, suggesting the dream sequence involving a unicorn (in the Director’s and Final Cuts) was an implant. In the Theatrical Cut that was missing, but for good measure he instead explicitly asked, “But are you sure you are a man?”

Related: Which Is The Best Version of Blade Runner?

Those final moments show some empathy in the pair’s relationship – a warning of the truth or that he’ll be coming – but, for the most part, they’re not exactly chummy. Deckard’s reaction to Gaff at the start indicates they’ve not met before – in the Theatrical version’s monologue he states he saw him around before but presumes he was only recently promoted to Blade Runner – and when working together they barely share a word.

Gaff In Blade Runner 2049

Gaff returns in Blade Runner 2049 for one scene early on in the film. Obviously 35 years older, he’s retired from blade running and lives in a futuristic care home. He’s approached by K who, after discovering that Deckard is intrinsically linked to the pregnant replicant he’s found the remains of, wants to learn more about him from his former partner.

The main takeaway from this scene is the maintaining of the original ending’s integrity. It was always intended to be coyly ambiguous if Deckard truly was a replicant, and that’s exemplified here by Gaff himself being convinced but the film making it very clear that’s just his opinion. How he knew about the unicorn or if it was a coincidence isn’t even glanced with, but his delivery in 2049 leaves the question hanging in much the same way as it was in 1982.

See also  Former Nintendo of America President Reggie FilsAime Praises Xbox

What we’re concerned with, however, is how he talks about his prior relationship with Deckard. He regards them as fully-fledged partners put together out of their shared desire for solitude; they both wanted to work alone and this was the best fit solution. From brief encounter to long-term partners: that’s quite a step away from what we saw in the original.

Screen Rant’s Managing Editor, Alex Leadbeater has been covering film online since 2012 and been a permanent fixture of SR since 2016. Based in London, he oversees a global news & features team based in NY, LA and beyond. You may have also seen/heard him on the Total Geekall podcast, unaffiliated YouTube channels, BBC Radio and CBC News. Growing up in the English countryside on a mixture of Star Wars, The Simpsons and Aardman, Alex is a lifelong movie obsessive. Despite a brief jaunt in Mathematics at Durham University, film writing was always his calling. He’s covered a wide range of movies and TV shows – from digging out obscure MCU Easter eggs to diving deep into deeper meanings of arthouse fare – and has covered a litany of set visits, junkets and film festivals. He once asked Tom Cruise about his supposedly fake-butt in Valkyrie (he swore it was all real).

Link Source : https://screenrant.com/blade-runner-2049-plot-hole-gaff-change/

Movies -