Once Upon A Time In Hollywood 10 Unpopular Opinions (According To Reddit)

Once Upon A Time In Hollywood: 10 Unpopular Opinions (According To Reddit)

Tarantino’s Once Upon A Time In Hollywood was a hit with audiences, but some fans on Reddit still have a lot of unpopular opinions to share.

You Are Reading :[thien_display_title]

With Once Upon A Time In Hollywood being very loosely based on real events and fictionalizing real-life people for his depraved, hyper pop-culture referencing love letter to Hollywood, Tarantino made one of his most polarizing movies yet.

Though the movie is mostly loved by critics and Tarantino fans for its sharp dialogue and hilarious characters, it has its fair share of haters. From blaming the characters for being underdeveloped to condemning him for making fun of beloved cinema icons to accusing the filmmaker of being a one-trick pony, Once Upon A Time In Hollywood is a breeding ground for unpopular opinions.

10 It’s A Big Budget Student Movie

Once Upon A Time In Hollywood broke the Tarantino mold in a number of ways, most notably in that there is no discernible plot, and that’s why it has been accused of being a student movie.

The climax wasn’t driven by the story, as the 2.5 hours leading up to the blood-soaked finale had nothing to do with it, and the characters didn’t necessarily have any kind of conflict, except for Rick’s career slowing down. But that was exactly the point, as it was more of a character study that explored the mindsets of different professionals in Hollywood.

9 It Doesn’t Make Sense To People Who Don’t Know The History

As Sharon Tate was murdered by the members of the Manson family in real life, it’s important that audiences know that before watching the movie. One Redditor argues that the movie won’t make sense to those who don’t know the history. To younger audiences outside the US, it could have been confusing, as few of them will know anything about the real-life events.

And even to some US viewers, the murder of Sharon Tate isn’t exactly taught in history class, so without knowing the historical context, the big twist at the end of the movie may not be a twist at all. But regardless, the film still has a great self-contained story with gripping characters, and though it has a deeper significance that younger audiences may miss out on, it encourages research after the fact.

8 It’s Pretentious

Tarantino has been known to overindulge in his worst habits in the past, whether it’s countless shots of bare feet or all of the pop culture references, be it music or film.

But some have complained that all of those habits are turned up to 11 in Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, calling the movie pretentious. However, being this many movies into his career, these kinds of things are expected from Tarantino, and it’s part of the reason why his movies are so beloved in the first place.

7 The Soundtrack Is Over Indulgent

There are a lot of great musical moments in Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, and Tarantino is known for his impeccable soundtracks, but he may have taken it too far this time. This Redditor may have a point, as the amount of the budget that went into the soundtrack must be astronomical.

Considering all of the driving scenes that are in the movie, music is played on the car radio, and as soon as one track ends another begins. And that continues into parties, whether it’s at the Playboy Mansion or in Sharon Tate’s residence. Even when the music isn’t diegetic, classic 60s songs are audible at almost any given moment.

6 Brad Pitt Didn’t Deserve The Oscar

Though he has won for Best Picture in the past, as he had produced 12 Years A Slave, Brad Pitt had never won an Academy Award for acting until Once Upon A Time In Hollywood. It was well deserved, but this Redditor thinks Pitt was playing an exaggerated version of himself, claiming that all he does in the movie is lean back in his chair and smirk.

However, just because the character doesn’t emote all that much doesn’t mean Pitt isn’t acting, and it’s one of his best performances of his career.

5 The Portrayal Of Bruce Lee Wasn’t That Bad

Of all the characters based on real-life people, one of the most controversial came when Bruce Lee appears and brags about his abilities in a cocky fashion, and then goes on to haphazardly fight Cliff. At the time, fans of Bruce Lee were angry at the way the fighter was written, especially considering that Cliff almost knocked him out.

It was so controversial that the martial arts guru’s daughter even chimed in, and Mike Moh even has mixed feelings after playing the character in the movie. But some didn’t think it was as bad as people say, as Lee was known to be cocky in real life, and he’s fighting a fictional character.

4 The Exposition Scene At The Playboy Mansion Wasn’t Necessary

Being a great movie about the film industry, Once Upon A Time In Hollywood is full of characters who were real-life actors. Steve McQueen, Michelle Phillips, Roman Polanski, and many others are all on sight at the Playboy Mansion, and it’s one of the many fun inside-baseball type scenes about the movie industry in the 60s that audiences are treated to.

But not everyone welcomed the scene, and they actually thought it was out of place, specifically singling out when McQueen explains the dynamic between Tate, Polanski, and Jay Sebring. However, if that didn’t happen, McQueen wouldn’t have had any lines, and Damian Lewis’ depiction of the real-life actor was too perfect to miss out on.

3 Sharon Tate Had No Purpose

Though Once Upon A Time In Hollywood is one of Margot Robbie’s best movies, she’s barely even in it, and she has very few lines of dialogue. This hot take argues that not only did she barely have any lines, but she had absolutely no purpose, especially considering the whole movie is about her murder.

The user claims that turning her into an angelic symbol of the 60s dehumanizes the real-live victim. However, it’s quite the opposite, as the film disassociates her with the cruel acts that happened to her and instead celebrates who she really was as a person.

2 Tarantino Cannibalizes The End Of Inglourious Basterds

Tarantino loves to reference his own movies, but one Redditor thinks he went too far. On top of hating the movie, the Redditor criticizes how Once Upon A Time In Hollywood borrrows too much from Inglourious Basterds and that it uses the exact same plot twist in the final act.

As Basterds is the first movie in which Tarantino rewrites history, by having Hitler get brutally murdered by being mercilessly shot with a machine gun, the same things happens in Hollywood. As Rick and Cliff kill the real-life murderers of Sharon Tate before they reach Tate’s house, the Redditor claims that the Basterds ending was cannibalized.

1 Too Much Driving Around

A small minority have complained about how much driving is in the movie. As the movie looks great and Tarantino was able to seemingly teleport the whole of Hollywood back to the 60s, the director clearly wanted all of that work to be shown on screen, and the best way to do that is by having Cliff drive through it.

Millions of dollars were spent on transforming these streets into the bygone era, and as it’s Tarantino’s most meditative movie, it’s all about the atmosphere. Whether it’s looking at the 60s backdrop or listening to the car radio, as real archived recordings from the 60s were used, the experience is all about soaking up the aesthetic.

Link Source : https://screenrant.com/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-reddit-unpopular-opinions/

• Lucifer Season 5 Part 1s Ending Explained [SPOILER] Is Finally Revealed

• Pokémon Sword & Shield 10 Best Areas To Explore For DarkTypes

• Resident Evil Welcome To Raccoon City —The 10 Best References To The Resident Evil Games

• Marlon Brando His 5 Best (& 5 Worst) Films According To IMDb

• Snapchat Owner Snap Exploring How To Bypass Apples App Transparency Rules

• Lost Girls What Happened To Mari Gilbert & Her Daughters In Real Life

• New Girl 10 Easter Eggs You Missed In The Show