HDMI Vs DisplayPort Which Is Best for TV & Gaming

HDMI Vs. DisplayPort: Which Is Best for TV & Gaming?

Contents

This comparison is extremely technical and probably doesn’t matter for people who aren’t spending thousands of dollars on gaming hardware.

You Are Reading :[thien_display_title]

HDMI Vs DisplayPort Which Is Best for TV & Gaming

As refresh rates and resolutions begin to matter more in our daily lives, video game and television display enthusiasts find themselves questioning which connection type is better: DisplayPort or HDMI. It’s a tough question to answer, mostly because the word “gaming” can mean many different things.

For the uninitiated, DisplayPort and HDMI are both cable standards for connecting devices to televisions or monitors. Over the past 15 years or so, these connection types have replaced older standards like AV cables (those old-school yellow, white, and red cables you might remember from the original Sony PlayStation) and RGB. Each does HD signals and audio at high bandwidths, moving data from one port to another, rather than splitting into multiple ports as our older cables did.

DisplayPort and HDMI differ in use cases and bandwidth. DisplayPort is technically better, as it has multi-stream transport (MST), meaning it can connect to multiple displays from one port. Additionally, DisplayPort has higher bandwidth in most of its iterations than HDMI. For example, the budding next-generation standards for the two are HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0. The latter has dramatically higher bandwidth before compression. However, there are caveats in almost every area of this debate which separate the two cables. DisplayPort length stops at 9 feet, whereas HDMI goes to about 49. DisplayPort connects to more monitors than HDMI, but HDMI connects to more… everything else.

See also  The Hobbit Trilogy Each Main Character’s Worst Decision

Comparing DisplayPort and HDMI’s Use Cases

The defining factor in which connection type is better is the use case. The display setup and hardware outputting the visuals basically dictate which cable is better and, oftentimes, which can even be used. To start, for anyone playing PC games on a monitor that doesn’t have a refresh rate over 120 Hz, G-Sync or FreeSync, and 4K output, this debate is basically irrelevant. Both cable types, in their most common forms, can handle 1080p at well over 120 Hz easily, and their color ranges would be practically identical.

For people using monitors with very high refresh rates and who want to take advantage of G-Sync, DisplayPort is the best option. AMD and Nvidia GPUs that support refresh rates above 144 Hz are typically DisplayPort and HDMI compatible. But, monitors that will display at those levels are almost exclusively relying on DisplayPort, and on the off chance that a 1440p or better monitor with G-Sync or FreeSync does support HDMI, it’s probably prohibitively expensive.

For people connecting a PC to a television, it makes more sense to go with HDMI since most TVs don’t support DisplayPort at all. For people playing console games or connecting devices like Apple TV or Roku, HDMI is literally the only choice, so your decision is already made. Furthermore, HDMI is the standard when it comes to most home entertainment hardware or theatre setups. Also, despite DisplayPort’s advantages at the highest levels (we’re talking 4K, 85 Hz – higher than almost any graphics cards and monitors on the market can manage anyway), HDMI has comparable performance. So, it could be argued that HDMI’s ubiquity for games and TV outside of the PC landscape is a big enough advantage to make it better than DisplayPort… or perhaps “more useful” is a better description. DisplayPort, however, is better if you’re strictly going from a powerful PC to a high refresh rate monitor.

See also  How Much Of Cruella’s Dogs Are CGI (& What’s Real)

Link Source : https://screenrant.com/hdmi-vs-displayport-best-for-tv-gaming/

Movies -